Infinispan Developer List

[infinispan-dev] Fwd: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
♦
♦
 4 messages Options
Elias Ross
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
♦
♦

[infinispan-dev] Fwd: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release

Elias Ross
Now that I left my old company, I might be able to work on integrating this.

But is there still any interest in JDBM? Does it actually get used?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jan Kotek <[hidden email]>
Date: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM
Subject: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release
To: [hidden email], [hidden email]


Hi,

I am proud to announce stable release of JDBM2. It is fork of 1.0,
which integrates most of patches developed in here.
It is faster and more space efficient than older release.

home page:
http://code.google.com/p/jdbm2/
announcement:
http://www.kotek.net/blog/jdbm2_released

Regards,
Jan Kotek
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
Galder Zamarreño
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
♦
♦

Re: [infinispan-dev] Fwd: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release

Galder Zamarreño
It'd be interesting to hear what the rest have to say, but I haven't seen JDBM much in use in the forums.

Clearly JDBM based cache stores compete with FileCacheStore, so if you're interested in integrating JDBM2, you might wanna investigate what it brings different/better as opposed to FCS.

That might be key to transforming current FCS usages (i.e AS6 EJB3 SFSB passivation) to JDBM2.

On Dec 24, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Elias Ross wrote:

> Now that I left my old company, I might be able to work on integrating this.
>
> But is there still any interest in JDBM? Does it actually get used?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jan Kotek <[hidden email]>
> Date: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM
> Subject: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release
> To: [hidden email], [hidden email]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am proud to announce stable release of JDBM2. It is fork of 1.0,
> which integrates most of patches developed in here.
> It is faster and more space efficient than older release.
>
> home page:
> http://code.google.com/p/jdbm2/
> announcement:
> http://www.kotek.net/blog/jdbm2_released
>
> Regards,
> Jan Kotek
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache


_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
Manik Surtani
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
♦
♦

Re: [infinispan-dev] Fwd: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release

Manik Surtani
Or perhaps look at enhancing FCS.  :)

JDBM's lack of concurrent transactional writes is a pretty big show stopper for most.



On 3 Jan 2011, at 10:43, Galder Zamarreño wrote:

It'd be interesting to hear what the rest have to say, but I haven't seen JDBM much in use in the forums.

Clearly JDBM based cache stores compete with FileCacheStore, so if you're interested in integrating JDBM2, you might wanna investigate what it brings different/better as opposed to FCS.

That might be key to transforming current FCS usages (i.e AS6 EJB3 SFSB passivation) to JDBM2.

On Dec 24, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Elias Ross wrote:

Now that I left my old company, I might be able to work on integrating this.

But is there still any interest in JDBM? Does it actually get used?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jan Kotek <[hidden email]>
Date: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM
Subject: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release
To: [hidden email], [hidden email]


Hi,

I am proud to announce stable release of JDBM2. It is fork of 1.0,
which integrates most of patches developed in here.
It is faster and more space efficient than older release.

home page:
http://code.google.com/p/jdbm2/
announcement:
http://www.kotek.net/blog/jdbm2_released

Regards,
Jan Kotek
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache


_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev



_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
Manik Surtani
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
♦
♦

Re: [infinispan-dev] Fwd: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release

Manik Surtani
Just to pre-empt the obvious question of how to enhance the FCS, perhaps an alternate B-tree impl (as opposed to the existing hash bucket based impl) is in order?


On 4 Jan 2011, at 16:57, Manik Surtani wrote:

Or perhaps look at enhancing FCS.  :)

JDBM's lack of concurrent transactional writes is a pretty big show stopper for most.



On 3 Jan 2011, at 10:43, Galder Zamarreño wrote:

It'd be interesting to hear what the rest have to say, but I haven't seen JDBM much in use in the forums.

Clearly JDBM based cache stores compete with FileCacheStore, so if you're interested in integrating JDBM2, you might wanna investigate what it brings different/better as opposed to FCS.

That might be key to transforming current FCS usages (i.e AS6 EJB3 SFSB passivation) to JDBM2.

On Dec 24, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Elias Ross wrote:

Now that I left my old company, I might be able to work on integrating this.

But is there still any interest in JDBM? Does it actually get used?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jan Kotek <[hidden email]>
Date: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM
Subject: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release
To: [hidden email], [hidden email]


Hi,

I am proud to announce stable release of JDBM2. It is fork of 1.0,
which integrates most of patches developed in here.
It is faster and more space efficient than older release.

home page:
http://code.google.com/p/jdbm2/
announcement:
http://www.kotek.net/blog/jdbm2_released

Regards,
Jan Kotek
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache


_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev





_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
Loading...
Free forum by Nabble Edit this page